Home | Feedback | Locations to buy the paper | Subscriptions | Facebook | Twitter | Vevay Lifestyles
Vevay Newspapers | Vevay, IN

home : news : news May 24, 2016

4/3/2014 3:00:00 PM
Joe Leatherbury opposed to mural coming down

Last week, Historic Vevay, Inc., which operates the Historic Hoosier Theater in Vevay, announced that its board of directors had made the difficult decision to have the mural on the south side of the exterior of the building removed.

Experts in historic preservation, including Indiana Landmarks, Inc., told the board that the only way to structurally save the south wall of the theater was to remove the mural because the paint used is sealing the old brick and not allowing it to breath.

This is causing the brick to break down and erode, putting the wall and the entire building in peril.

But the artist who painted the mural disagrees; and believes that the mural is protected through the 'Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990'.

Douglas Leatherbury, attorney for artist Josiah Leatherbury, wrote a letter to both Historic Vevay and also Vevay Main Street on May 13th of last year advising both entities that the mural shouldn't be tampered with in any way, because it would violate the terms of the Visual Artists Rights Act.

That letter was in response to Historic Vevay, Inc., planning to have another artist work on the mural in preparation for the Vevay-Switzerland County Bicentennial celebration.

In the letter, Douglas Leatherbury wrote:

Please accept this letter as a kind notice to cease and desist any planned actions to retouch, refresh, repaint or otherwise modify this work of art.

The Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 grants three rights: the right to attribution, the right of integrity, and the right to prevent destruction. The Visual Rights Act (VARA) provides in relevant part that the author of a work of visual art shall have the right:

" ...(A) to prevent any intentional distortion, mutilation, or other modification of that work which would be prejudicial to his or her honor or reputation, and any intentional distortion, mutilation, or modification of that work is a violation of that right,"

These " ... rights spring from a belief that an artist in the process of creation injects his spirit into the work and that the artist's personality, as well as the integrity of the work, should therefore be protected and preserved." Carter v. Helmsley-Spear, 717 F.3rd 77, 81 (2nd cir. 1995)

When Josiah's family and friends view this work of art, they see not only the work itself, but the enduring spirit of Vevay, Switzerland County, and the Terry Street Ohio River Landing, and the very spirit of Josiah Mark Leatherbury permanently imbedded therein....


After receiving that letter, Historic Vevay did stop its plans to have work done on the mural, but that led to discussions with Seth Elder of Indiana Landmarks, Inc., who - upon inspecting the mural - joined with others in saying that the mural would have to be taken down if the theater was to be saved, because damage was already occurring to the interior south wall as a result of moisture being trapped in the wall because of the type of paint that had been used in creating the mural.

In last week's article, board members Fred Stave and Toni Kniola said that they, along with others, had traveled to Salem, Indiana, to the office of Douglas Leatherbury to discuss the matter. They said that after seeing all of the information, there was a verbal agreement that the mural would, unfortunately, have to come down, and that arrangements would be made to properly honor the mural and the artist with a display inside the theater.

But, after last week's article announcing that the mural would have to come down, Douglas Leatherbury sent anther letter to the board of directors of Historic Vevay, Inc., informing it that there was no consent by Joe Leatherbury to remove or adapt the mural.

The letter states:

Please be advised that Josiah Mark Leatherbury does not consent to any planned action to remove or modify the mural of Historic Vevay.

Please accept this letter as a kind notice to cease and desist from any action to remove or modify Joe's mural.

If you are determined to destroy the mural, you must first purchase Josiah's artistic rights and interests in the artwork.

You should also know that the paint Josiah used was water-based that is designed to allow moisture to escape. The paint used protects the bricks and does no harm whatsoever. More importantly, however, I believe the artwork is so valuable to the history of Vevay that it must be protected at all costs. Unless you relent in this matter, a legal action will be filed without further notice.

Reader Comments

Posted: Friday, April 4, 2014
Article comment by: Hugh Flittner

Save the building. Take down that mural!!

Posted: Friday, April 4, 2014
Article comment by: Suzanne Pearl Downs

I read this article with heavy heart as my Grandmother and many relatives were born and raised in the small quaint town of Vevay Indiana. Everytime I visit I know I have roots and I have wings so to speak.
I do see the point that as the mural ages it does require conservation and preservation as well as the structural integrity of the building. It seems as I read that there is a range of problems...you have a building with an exterior wall and on that mural painted side wall it has been exposed to harsh elements of wind, rain, pollution, freeze-thaw and other factors that can make the beautiful mural deteriorate. I would blame it on evironmental factors not a water-based or acrylic paint.
In general, a mural should never be painted on a south-facing wall where direct and constant exposure to ultraviolet rays accelerates deterioration and paint fading.
You have a very old building, that was constructed in 1837, that everyone wants to see be preserved.
However, the image and the copyright belong to the artist. As long as the artist is living, he or she also has a voice in the muralís treatment.
I stand with the Artist in that Josiah Leatherbury who is native and kin to Vevay, should have a voice - 1st right to re-paint or re-touch his mural or he should be rightfully compensated for his "fine art" or original artwork and rights to his mural.
I believe the mural is a part of Vevay history in itself and just like the Theatre building the mural should be preserved in it's original state. That mural portray's Vevay's rich history, social and artistic state. It has been enjoyed and witnessed by families and travelers making time for small talk.
This mural signifies the fruits of human creativity with it capturing the nature and make-up of the Vevay rriver town, portraying history, music, visual arts, learning, food, theater and the warmth of the small town.
I can't help but think that the majority of Vevay and Switzerland County would stand behind Josiah and the beautiful mural.

Posted: Thursday, April 3, 2014
Article comment by: Doug Leatherbury

I want to thank the Vevay Reveille for bringing this tmportant issue before the public Also, I would be pleased to hear the opinions of my fellow citizens in my beloved Vevay, Switzerland County, Indiana. Your Friend, Doug Leatherbury

Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search

Contact Us

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Home | Feedback | Locations to buy the paper | Subscriptions | Vevay Lifestyles
Copyright 2014, Vevay Media Group, Inc.
111 West Market Street Vevay, IN 47043

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved